INEC Releases Key Statement on Petition for Recall of Senator Natasha, Details Surface

• Stakeholders in Kogi Central have begun the process of recalling the suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who is representing them in the national assembly, Abuja
• Legit.ng recalls that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s constituents initiated a two-day recall exercise across all the polling units in the district over alleged poor performance, among other alleged shortcomings
• But INEC, in a new statement, suggested that the request does not meet the requirements of submission, as contained in its regulations

Legit.ng journalist, Ridwan Adeola Yusuf, has over 9 years of experience covering politics, elections, and governance.

FCT, Abuja - The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) held its regular weekly meeting on Tuesday, March 25, 2025.

Legit.ng reports that among other matters, the meeting discussed the petition for the recall of suspended Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the senator representing Kogi Central.

The commission said the process of recall is enshrined in the 1999 constitution, the Electoral Act 2022 as well as its regulations and guidelines for recall 2024. INEC stated that all petitions will be treated in strict compliance with the legal framework.

Read also

INEC finally takes action amid Natasha's ongoing recall process

INEC provides update on recall process against Natasha

Providing an update on the petition for the recall of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan via a statement by Sam Olumekun, its national commissioner and chairman, information and voter education committee, INEC said the request was accompanied by six bags of documents.

The documents were reportedly signatures collected from over half of the 474,554 registered voters spread across 902 polling units (PUs) in 57 registration areas (wards) in the five local government areas (LGAs) of Ajaokuta, Adavi, Okene, Ogori/Magongo, and Okehi.

Moves to recall Natasha: INEC shares observation

INEC's statement reads:

"The commission's immediate observation is that the representatives of the petitioners did not provide their contact address, telephone number(s), and e-mail address(es) in the covering letter forwarding the petition through which they can be contacted as provided in Clause 1(f) of our Regulations and Guidelines. The address given is "Okene, Kogi state", which is not a definite location for contacting the petitioners. Only the telephone number of "the lead petitioner" is provided as against the numbers of all the other representatives of the petitioners."

Read also

Akpabio: Natasha breaks silence amid recall process from Senate

INEC stressed that the recall of a legislator is the prerogative of registered voters in a constituency who sign a petition indicating loss of confidence in the legislator representing them.

It said:

"Once the petition meets the requirements of submission, as contained in our regulations, the Commission shall commence the verification of the signatures in each Polling Unit in an open process restricted to registered voters that signed the petition only. The petitioners and the member whose recall is sought shall be at liberty to nominate agents to observe the verification, while interested observers and the media will also be accredited. At each Polling Unit, signatories to the petition shall be verified using the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).

"Consequently, if the petitioners fully comply with the requirements of Clause 1(f) of the Regulations and Guidelines regarding the submission of their petition, the Commission will announce the next steps in line with the extant laws, regulations, and guidelines. In the absence of a definite contact address, the Commission is making efforts to use other means to notify the representatives of the petitioners of the situation."

Read also

Tinubu dragged to court over Fubara's suspension, state of emergency in Rivers

Conclusively, INEC reassured Nigerians that it will be guided by the legal framework for the recall which has been activated, adding that the public should ignore any speculations and insinuations on social media.

Read more on Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan vs Akpabio:

• “Akpabio said my waist would make good movements,” Natasha alleges, shares what other senators did
• Diaspora group condemns Senator Natasha for 'spoiling Nigeria's image abroad'

Senator Natasha rejects purported apology

Earlier, Legit.ng reported that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan denied reports suggesting that she has apologised to the senate over the controversy that led to her suspension.

In a statement obtained by Legit.ng, the Kogi lawmaker described the claims as "false and misleading," reaffirming her stance on the issue that resulted in her six-month suspension.

Source: Legit.ng