JUST IN: INEC Seeks Legal Backing for IReV, Reasons Emerge

JUST IN: INEC Seeks Legal Backing for IReV, Reasons Emerge

  • INEC plans to amend the Electoral Act 2022 to clarify issues around the manual transfer and electronic transmission of election results
  • Following opposition concerns over the 2023 presidential election, the Supreme Court upheld INEC’s position that the IReV was not a primary transmission tool
  • INEC calls for legal backing to ensure clarity in result management, citing it as one of the eight key legislative changes needed after the 2023 elections

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced plans to seek an amendment to the Electoral Act 2022 to clarify issues surrounding election result management.

Specifically, the move is to get clarification on particularly the manual transfer and electronic transmission of results.

Yakubu-led INEC seeks clarification on IReV
INEC moves to get legal clarity on IReV Photo credit: Mohmood Yakubu
Source: Twitter

INEC chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, disclosed the proposal during a meeting with Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) in Abuja on Thursday, December 12.

Yakubu cited it as one of the eight legislative changes stemming from the 2023 general elections that require the National Assembly's action.

Read also

LG autonomy: What will happen to govs who tamper with LGA funds, circumvent Supreme Court judgement

"Among the major highlights of the commission’s recommendations is the imperative of legal clarity in result management with regard to manual transfer versus the electronic transmission of results," Yakubu said.

Legit.ng reports that INEC’s push for legal backing comes after the opposition raised concerns about the credibility of the 2023 presidential election, primarily due to the electoral body’s failure to rely on election results uploaded to the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV).

This followed what INEC described as a "system glitch" that hampered the uploading of results in real time.

Despite initial promises to use the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and IReV for the elections, the commission resorted to manual collation of results, stating that the IReV was intended to enhance transparency, not serve as a primary results collation system.

Court ruling and opposition reaction

The argument that the IReV was not a primary transmission tool was upheld by the Supreme Court, which ruled that the non-availability of election results on the portal could not invalidate the February 2023 presidential election results, a decision that surprised many opposition members.

Read also

2027 Presidency: PDP's fates finally emerges amid internal crisis

INEC chairman risks jail term

Earlier, Legit.ng reported that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) filed a contempt lawsuit against Yakubu.

SERAP filed the suit against the INEC boss for "failing to investigate the allegations of electoral offences committed during the 2023 general elections, identify suspected perpetrators and their sponsors, and ensure their effective prosecution.”

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!

Source: Legit.ng

Authors:
Ezra Ukanwa avatar

Ezra Ukanwa (Editor) Ezra Ukanwa is a Reuters-certified journalist with over 5 years of professional experience. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mass Communication from Anchor University, Lagos. Currently, he is the Politics and Current Affairs Editor at Legit.ng, where he brings his expertise to provide incisive, impactful coverage of national events. Ezra was recognized as Best Campus Journalist at the Anchor University Communications Awards in 2019 and is also a Fellow of the Nigerian Institute of Management (NIM). Contact him at: ezra.ukanwa@corp.legit.ng or +2349036989944

Tags: