EU court advisor recommends new ruling in Apple tax case

EU court advisor recommends new ruling in Apple tax case

The EU claimed Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland
The EU claimed Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland. Photo: Lionel BONAVENTURE / AFP/File
Source: AFP

The European Court of Justice's top legal advisor recommended on Thursday that an EU court make a new ruling in the long-running 13-billion-euro ($14-billion) tax case between Apple and Brussels.

The landmark case is one of the most fierce battles between the European Commission and big tech, dating back to 2016 when the EU's executive arm accused Ireland of allowing Apple to escape 13 billion euros in taxes.

The EU claimed that, between 2003 and 2014, Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland, which is the European hub for big tech.

Brussels alleged that this amounted to illegal "state aid" by Ireland.

The opinion of Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella is not binding on the court, but it will be influential and taken as a sign of the direction the case is taking.

Read also

Supreme Court's Judgement: 5 key takeaways from Peter Obi’s ‘world press conference’

The bloc's highest court heard the commission's appeal earlier this year against a 2020 decision by the EU's lower General Court to annul its order that Apple repay the money.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!

But according to Pitruzzella, the General Court "committed a series of errors in law", and therefore he recommended setting aside the previous judgement.

"In the Advocate General's opinion, it is therefore necessary for the General Court to carry out a new assessment," the ECJ said in a statement.

A final decision by the ECJ is expected within a few months but the judges are not bound by Thursday's opinion.

Apple has pushed back against the commission's claims.

"The General Court's ruling was very clear that Apple received no selective advantage and no state aid, and we believe that should be upheld," Apple said in a statement.

Read also

Panama bans new mining contracts in response to mass protests

During a hearing in May, the commission's lawyer, Paul-John Loewenthal, told the ECJ there had been a "breach of procedure" and "numerous other legal errors" when the lower court heard the case.

Apple's lawyer Daniel Beard pushed back against Loewenthal's claims at the time. "Apple has paid the taxes that were due under the Irish tax code," Beard said.

Apple has been present in Ireland since the 1980s.

The EU has faced difficulty justifying its tax decisions in recent years with previous court losses against Amazon and Starbucks.

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.