Trump's trade math baffles economists

Trump's trade math baffles economists

The numbers presented on the chart Trump used in his presentation differ from actual tariff figures
The numbers presented on the chart Trump used in his presentation differ from actual tariff figures. Photo: Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP
Source: AFP

Trade economists were scratching their heads on Thursday at the formula used by the White House to measure trade imbalances and inflict punishment on all its global trading partners.

Handed a chart in the White House Rose Garden, US President Donald Trump presented the rationale for how his administration would impose reciprocal tariffs on partners ranging from major powers like China and Europe to the smallest nations.

The figures presented bear little resemblance to actual tariff levels, however.

While Trump's chart claims China imposes a 67 percent tariff on American products, World Trade Organization data shows China's average tariff in 2024 was just 4.9 percent.

Similar discrepancies exist for the European Union (39 percent versus 1.7 percent) and India (52 percent versus 6.2 percent).

Administration officials explained they incorporated factors beyond tariffs, including environmental standards and "currency manipulation and trade barriers."

The US trade representative published a formula with Greek letters to provide some academic credibility to the calculations -- and one that actually did not include tariff levels as a factor.

Read also

Wall St leads rout as world reels from Trump tariffs

Following Trump's trade philosophy, the formula takes a country's trade deficit with the US as evidence of unfairness.

Officials then divided this deficit by the value of goods imported from that country to determine what they call "the tariff rate necessary" to balance the bilateral deficits.

Two other variables were included -- price elasticity of import demand and elasticity of import prices -- but were set such that they cancelled each other out.

Trump said the administration then halved the resulting figure because "we're nice," while imposing a flat 10 percent tax on countries with which the US maintains a trade surplus.

"There's so much wrong with this approach that it's hard to know where to start," Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, a trade economist and frequent Trump critic, wrote on his blog.

Trump's focus on trade deficits reflects his view that they represent American job losses to foreign production -- a zero-sum standpoint that contradicts established international economic principles since World War II.

Read also

'Shocking': US tariffs worse than feared for Vietnamese exporters

To most economists, Trump's deficit-obsessed beliefs dismiss the intricacies of the US economy, the world’s biggest, where a company like Apple manufactures 90 percent of its products abroad, but delivers huge wealth domestically.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.