Kate Bush leads UK musicians in 'silent album' AI fight

Kate Bush leads UK musicians in 'silent album' AI fight

British singer Annie Lennox of the  Eurythmics has joined more than 1,000 musicians who have released a silent album to protest proposed changes to UK copyright law around AI
British singer Annie Lennox of the Eurythmics has joined more than 1,000 musicians who have released a silent album to protest proposed changes to UK copyright law around AI. Photo: GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/Getty Images via AFP
Source: AFP

Over 1,000 musicians including Kate Bush, Annie Lennox and Damon Albarn on Tuesday released a silent album in protest at proposed changes to UK copyright law around artificial intelligence (AI) which they say will legalise music theft.

"Is This What We Want" featuring recordings of empty studios and performance spaces is part of a growing backlash against the government's plans.

Writers and musicians including Bush also denounced the proposals as a "wholesale giveaway" to Silicon Valley in a letter to The Times newspaper on Tuesday.

Other signatories included Paul McCartney, Elton John, Ed Sheeran, Dua Lipa and Sting as well as writers Kazuo Ishiguro, Michael Morpurgo and Helen Fielding.

In a very rare move, UK newspapers also highlighted their concerns launching a "Make it Fair" campaign featuring wrap round ads on the front of almost every national daily, with an inside editorial by the papers' editors.

Read also

Fires, strikes, pandemic and AI: Hollywood workers can't catch a break

Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is considering overhauling the law to allow AI companies to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless rights holders opt out.

But artists say opting out will be difficult and onerous.

Album organiser Ed Newton-Rex said musicians were "united in their thorough condemnation of this ill-thought-through plan".

"The government's proposal would hand the life's work of the country's musicians to AI companies, for free, letting those companies exploit musicians’ work to outcompete them," he said.

"It is a plan that would not only be disastrous for musicians, but that is totally unnecessary. The UK can be leaders in AI without throwing our world-leading creative industries under the bus," he added.

'Catastrophic'

The album's release was timed to coincide with the end of the government's public consultation on the proposed changes.

Starmer has previously said the government needs to "get the balance right" with copyright and AI while noting the technology represented "a huge opportunity".

Read also

'Monster Hunter' on prowl for new audiences as latest game drops

Authors have also spoken out about the UK government's plans.

Best selling US writer Scott Turow last week criticised the "cavalier attitude of the British government" which he said proposed to "allow big tech companies to scrape all of our books and repackage our words as 'original content'."

"Instead of trying to prevent this, the British government wants to give them a free pass. That will be catastrophic, not just for writers in the UK, but all over the world," he wrote in the Daily Mail.

In a rare interview last month, McCartney, 82, one of the two surviving members of The Beatles, told the BBC any new legislation had to protect creative thinkers and artists, warning "you're not going to have them" without that.

"You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don't own it, and they don't have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it off," he said.

Read also

Hong Kong and Singapore lead Asia's drive to cash in on crypto boom

"The truth is, the money's going somewhere ... Somebody's getting paid, so why shouldn't it be the guy who sat down and wrote 'Yesterday'?"

In 2023, UK music contributed £7.6 billion to the UK economy, with exports of UK music reaching £4.6 billion.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.