Malaysia Airlines finds 'potential issue' on A350-900 engine

Malaysia Airlines finds 'potential issue' on A350-900 engine

The EU said no mandatory inspections were needed 'at this stage' for Rolls-Royce engines installed on Airbus A350-900 aircraft
The EU said no mandatory inspections were needed 'at this stage' for Rolls-Royce engines installed on Airbus A350-900 aircraft. Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI / AFP/File
Source: AFP

Malaysia Airlines said on Friday it had found a "potential issue" with the engine of an Airbus A350-900 aircraft in its fleet but added that it had been resolved.

The issue comes after the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued an emergency directive to airlines ordering mandated inspections on A350-1000s which are powered by XWB-97 engines made by Rolls-Royce.

The checks were prompted by an "in-flight engine fire" on one of Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific's Zurich-bound flights.

Malaysia Airlines' fleet of A350-900 planes "recently underwent a precautionary inspection, during which a potential issue with high-pressure fuel hoses on one aircraft was identified," the carrier said in a statement.

"This finding was swiftly resolved, and the aircraft has been fully cleared for service in accordance with stringent maintenance protocols," it added.

Read also

Japanese 7-Eleven owner says rejected initial takeover offer from Canadian rival

On Friday, following the incident, EASA said extending its compulsory engine inspections to include the XWB-84 engines found on the Malaysia Airlines Airbus A350-900 is "not warranted at this stage".

PAY ATTENTION: Share your outstanding story with our editors! Please reach us through info@corp.legit.ng!

The Cathay incident prompted other airlines in the region to carry out similar checks on their A350-900 and A350-1000 models, which are powered by Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-84 and XWB-97 engines, respectively.

The EASA said Thursday that Cathay's A350-1000 aircraft suffered an engine failure due to a high-pressure fuel hose failing.

It added that there was an "in-flight engine fire shortly after take-off", which was "promptly detected and extinguished".

The EASA said the XWB-84 engines "are similar but differ in design and service history" to the XWB-97.

Airbus on Friday said the EASA directive "clearly limits these (checks) to the Trent XWB-97 engine and says inspections on the Trent XWB-84 are not warranted based on current available information".

Read also

EU orders Airbus A350 inspections after Cathay engine fire

"I'm sure we'll discover more as the investigation progresses - and which only EASA can communicate about," a spokesperson for the European aircraft maker told AFP.

The Airbus issues come as its US rival Boeing has strived to overcome concerns about safety and quality control problems in recent years.

'Precautionary inspection'

There are 86 A350-1000 planes in service worldwide, according to the EASA.

A spokesperson for Malaysia Airlines told AFP that the carrier has seven A350-900s with Trent XWB-84 engines, all of which have been inspected.

"Safety and reliability are central to our operations, and we remain unwavering in our commitment to ensuring the highest standards of care for our passengers and crew," the airline said in its statement.

Rolls-Royce said Thursday it was launching "a one-time precautionary engine inspection programme" which may apply "to a portion of the A350 fleet".

The first A350 was delivered to Qatar Airways at the end of 2014.

Read also

Customs declares state of emergency at Nigerian Port as Expert proposes N1,000/$ clearance rate

Since the end of the production of the jumbo A380, the A350 is Airbus's largest aircraft.

The largest version, the 1000, can carry nearly 500 passengers and travel more than 16,000 kilometres (nearly 10,000 miles) in one hop.

That will be pushed to nearly 18,000 km in the "Sunrise" version ordered by Australian airline Qantas to fly directly between Sydney and London.

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.