Qantas loses court fight over Covid lockdown layoffs

Qantas loses court fight over Covid lockdown layoffs

Australia's High Court has ruled that Qantas illegally sacked 1,700 ground staff during the Covid pandemic
Australia's High Court has ruled that Qantas illegally sacked 1,700 ground staff during the Covid pandemic. Photo: William WEST / AFP/File
Source: AFP

PAY ATTENTION: Follow our WhatsApp channel to never miss out on the news that matters to you!

Qantas illegally sacked 1,700 ground staff during Covid-19 lockdowns, Australia's High Court ruled Wednesday, dismissing an appeal by the airline and opening up the prospect of hefty compensation.

The 102-year-old airline is already under fire over soaring ticket prices, allegations it sold tickets for cancelled flights, and claims that it pressured the government to stop international rival Qatar Airways from offering more flights to Australia.

Australia's Federal Court ruled last year that Qantas's outsourcing of ground staff jobs at the height of the pandemic was illegal despite its stated "commercial imperatives".

The court said Qantas had failed to disprove that one reason for the mass sacking was to prevent the workers from taking industrial action in the future.

The High Court said it agreed with that ruling, unanimously dismissing Qantas's appeal.

Read also

Venice gives green light to ticket 'experiment' for tourists

The Transport Workers Union (TWU), which took Qantas to court over the layoffs, hailed the decision and called for the airline's board to be replaced.

PAY ATTENTION: Share your outstanding story with our editors! Please reach us through info@corp.legit.ng!

Former chief executive Alan Joyce stepped down last week after 15 years in the post, departing earlier than he had planned as Qantas's reputation took a battering despite bumper profits for shareholders.

"Qantas workers have made history today," said TWU national secretary Michael Kaine.

"The Joyce regime has been toppled but the airline cannot achieve the reset necessary for its survival under the same board that presided over the largest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history," he said.

"The final act of this board should be to strip Alan Joyce of his bonuses and follow him out the door."

'Regret the personal impact'

He called on Qantas's new chief executive Vanessa Hudson to publicly apologise to the sacked workers and commit to a "speedy and non-adversarial" approach to court hearings on compensation and penalties.

Read also

US judge says 2008 bank fraudsters got off easy

Qantas said it "acknowledges and accepts" the High Court ruling.

"As we have said from the beginning, we deeply regret the personal impact the outsourcing decision had on all those affected and we sincerely apologise for that," it said in a statement.

The airline said the Federal Court had already ruled out reinstating the sacked workers.

Qantas said the court's consideration of compensation for workers and penalties would "factor in" redundancy payments it had already made.

"The decision to outsource the remainder of the airline's ground handling function was made in August 2020, when borders were closed, lockdowns were in place and no COVID vaccine existed," it said.

"The likelihood of a years' long crisis led Qantas to restructure its business to improve its ability to survive and ultimately recover."

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.