Global site navigation

Local editions

Swatch can challenge Malaysia's Pride watch seizure, court rules
Business and Economy

Swatch can challenge Malaysia's Pride watch seizure, court rules

by  AFP 1 min read
Swatch has challenged Malaysia's seizure of more than 100 Pride-themed watches
Swatch has challenged Malaysia's seizure of more than 100 Pride-themed watches. Photo: FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP/File
Source: AFP

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ click on “Recommended for you” and enjoy!

A Malaysian court ruled Wednesday that Swatch can challenge the seizure of more than 100 Pride-themed watches, the Swiss company's lawyer said.

The government in Malaysia -- where homosexuality is outlawed and LGBTQ people face widespread discrimination -- has banned rainbow-themed Swatch timepieces, warning that owners or sellers face up to three years in prison.

In May, authorities raided Swatch stores at 11 malls across Malaysia, confiscating 172 watches they described as having "LGBT elements".

The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled Wednesday that Swatch can challenge that seizure through a judicial review, the company's lawyer Nizam Bashir told AFP.

"The court has agreed to hear Swatch's application for the return of the watches and damages," he said.

The court is expected to schedule a hearing on September 6, Nizam added.

Read also

Getir cuts over tenth of global workforce

PAY ATTENTION: Join Legit.ng Telegram channel! Never miss important updates!

In its suit challenging the seizure, Swatch said its "trading reputation has been damaged".

"The watches did not promote any sexual activity, but merely a fun and joyous expression of peace and love," it said in the suit, which seeks the return of the items as well as unspecified damages.

The Malaysian government said these watches "may harm... the interests of the nation by promoting, supporting and normalising the LGBTQ+ movement that is not accepted by the general public".

The seizure was based on Malaysia's Printing Presses and Publications Act of 1984, which critics have condemned as draconian.

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.

Hot: