TikTok under pressure as US lawmakers push government ban

TikTok under pressure as US lawmakers push government ban

TikTok is under fire from US lawmakers who say the Chinese-owned video-sharing platform represents a security risk
TikTok is under fire from US lawmakers who say the Chinese-owned video-sharing platform represents a security risk. Photo: Yuichi YAMAZAKI / AFP/File
Source: AFP

PAY ATTENTION: How media literate are you? Click to take a quiz – bust fake news with Legit.ng!

The US Congress is on the cusp of approving a nationwide ban on using TikTok on government devices because of perceived security risks -- thrusting the hugely popular video-sharing platform into a delicate position over Washington's ties to China.

After a Senate vote last week, the US House of Representatives could this week adopt a law prohibiting the use of TikTok on the professional phones of civil servants.

The measure would follow bans in nearly 20 US states, where Republicans have led the attack against TikTok, arguing that its ownership by Chinese firm ByteDance makes the app unsafe for Americans.

"The fundamental problem is this...TikTok is owned by ByteDance which is effectively controlled by the Chinese Communist Party," Republican congressman Mike Gallagher explained to CNN on Sunday.

But what has long been a rallying cry for conservatives is becoming increasingly widespread among their Democratic colleagues, to the point that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday she was in favor of putting the draft to a vote this week.

Read also

US political world seeks distance from disgraced donor Bankman-Fried

"This is not a political issue between Republicans and Democrats. This is a United States issue that we need to address nationally," Ryan McDougle, a Republican state senator from Virginia who has been at the forefront of the issue, told AFP.

PAY ATTENTION: Share your outstanding story with our editors! Please reach us through info@corp.legit.ng!

Another bill, also introduced last week by representatives from both parties, calls for an outright ban on TikTok in the United States, though it does not seem likely to be taken up for a formal vote for now.

No links to Communist Party

TikTok has worked hard to convince US authorities that it is not a threat and that US data is protected and stored on servers located in the United States.

But following media reports, it has also admitted that employees based in China had access to that data, although the company insisted it was under strict and highly limited circumstances.

Read also

Asian markets extend US rally ahead of inflation, Fed decision

"We have not been asked for such data from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). We have not provided US user data to the CCP, nor would we if asked," the company said in a letter to Congress.

Still, TikTok is fighting furiously to appease Washington and is putting all of its hopes in a long-term security deal with the administration of President Joe Biden that has been under negotiation for two years.

This would be done through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an interagency arm of the US government that assesses the risks of any foreign investment to national security.

A deal would bring "a comprehensive package of measures” and "independent oversight to address concerns about TikTok content recommendation and access to US user data," the company told AFP in a statement.

The arrangement would be "well beyond what any peer company is doing today," it added.

Read also

Musk to relaunch Twitter plan after fake account fiasco

But given the growing political pressure, finding common ground with the US government will be difficult, security experts said.

A deal "is going to be tricky," said Michael Daniel, executive director of the Cyber Threat Alliance, a non-governmental organization dedicated to cybersecurity.

According to Politico, some in the Biden administration are asking for an outright divestment by ByteDance of TikTok's US operations, the same position that was held by former president Donald Trump.

‘Ripple effect’

The fight over the fate of TikTok could soon become a real problem for users once Congress passes the government ban and Biden signs it into law.

"People haven’t really considered the potential ripple effect that this will have," said Karen Freberg, associate professor of strategic communications at the University of Louisville.

In particular, she mentioned "government contractors like Amazon" that may be prompted to align with the obligations placed on the public sector.

Read also

UK defends new post-Brexit finance reforms

TikTok's most crucial partner in the United States is Oracle, which stores the data of American users, and is also a US government contractor.

And like all major social networks, TikTok derives most of its revenue from advertising.

For Rebecca Long, of the digital marketing agency VisualFizz, the new push against TikTok is "worrying" for advertisers.

While TikTok's core target audience of under 25 year olds is fairly insensitive to politics, older users "are very aware" of the issues and are ready to act accordingly, Long said.

Freberg warned that "TikTok will always have an asterisk next to its name and companies that work with them will always have to keep that in the back of their minds."

On TikTok, videos from influencers are already circulating on the subject.

California-based Natalaya Michele is already looking ahead and recommends, in case of a ban, use of a VPN, or virtual private network, a tool that simulates connections from another country.

BryanBoy, a fashion vlogger with millions of followers, was more pessimistic: "If I were you, time to get a new skill."

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.